Understanding the efficiency formula for a 3-phase 3L NPC inverter
Hello,
I am currently simulating a 3-phase 3-level NPC inverter and checking its efficiency using different combinations of IGBTs and diodes. The initial model comes from a confidential source and uses the following formula to calculate efficiency:
\text{Efficiency} = \left(1 - \frac{P_\text{loss}}{P_\text{out}}\right) \times 100
Where:
Poutis the output power of the inverter (calculated from its nominal value)Plossis the total switching loss of the IGBTs and diodes
What I don’t understand is why this formula uses Pout in the denominator. Intuitively, it seems more correct to use:
\text{Efficiency} = \left(1 - \frac{P_\text{loss}}{P_\text{in}}\right) \times 100
where Pin is the input power.
After analyzing, I realized that the original formula is approximately valid if Ploss << Pout, which is true in my simulations. However, I could not find any references confirming whether this is an industry standard.
Questions:
- Is using
Poutin the denominator a common practice in inverter efficiency calculations? - Under what conditions is this formula considered accurate?
Any insights or references would be greatly appreciated!