Loss Discrepancy Between PLECS Thermal Model and Fuji Electric Online Simulator (7MBR50VD120-50)

Hi Plecs team,

I am fairly new to plecs and I have developed a three-phase, two-level inverter in PLECS using sinusoidal PWM. For the loss and thermal analysis, I am using the Fuji Electric IGBT module 7MBR50VD120-50, with the IGBT and diode thermally modeled based on the parameters provided in the datasheet.

After performing the steady-state analysis in PLECS, I calculated the conduction and switching losses and compared them with the results obtained from the Fuji Electric online simulator under what I believe are equivalent operating conditions. However, I am observing a significant discrepancy between the two sets of results.

I would appreciate any guidance on what aspects of my PLECS model might need adjustment (for example, device parameters, switching loss modeling, modulation assumptions, thermal setup, or operating conditions) in order to obtain loss values that are closer to those reported by the Fuji Electric online simulator.

attaching the simulation and xml files for reference

Thank you very much for your time and support. Any suggestions or best practices for aligning PLECS simulations with manufacturer-provided simulation tools would be greatly appreciated.

Best regards,
Yashaswini

fuji_typeg.plecs (94.7 KB)

new_fuji.xml (171.8 KB)(igbt xml file)

was not able to add diode xml file earlier adding it now

new_fuji_diode.xml (134.1 KB)

the plecs model losses are:

IGBT
Conduction : 1.74W
Turn on loss : 0.4744W
Turn off loss : 1.7815W

DIODE
Conduction loss : 0.2726W
Reverse recovery loss: 0.1617W

Fuji electric online simulator losses
IGBT
Conduction : 1.54W
Turn on loss : 0.47W
Turn off loss : 1.15W

DIODE
Conduction loss : 0.45W
Reverse recovery loss: 1.07W

the input parameters for both are same